Procurements & SupplementsSection I-6 Agency Construction Management Construction Management – CM as Adviser The CM as Adviser plays a critical role in the success of a project. A heavy emphasis should be placed on the proper selection of the CMa to provide the best value to the Owner. A Qualifications-Based Selection System (similar to that described for Design Professionals in Section I-2) should be used to solicit proposals from a reasonable number of prequalified Construction Managers. Solicitations should identify the scope of preconstruction, design, procurement, and construction phase services. Solicitations should also identify the CM’s responsibility for estimating, constructability review, project planning, and scheduling, along with the CM fee structure. It is appropriate for the Architect to assist the Owner in this process, if they are on board. Conversely, if the CMa is established first, it is appropriate for them to assist with the selection of the Architect. Competitive pricing of the trade and general contracts for construction typically is part of the CMa project delivery process. A competitive process can also be employed in the selection of the Construction Manager-Adviser. Evaluation of the CMa candidates’ experience, expertise, and marketplace position should be strongly considered, along with the CMa fee structure. When selecting a Construction Manager, careful consideration should be given equally to the staff, experience, and capabilities of the preconstruction phase team, as well as the construction phase team. Two commonly used contract forms for this project delivery system are AIA Document C132–2009 (formerly B801CMa–1992)Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Construction Manager as Adviser, and A132–2009 (formerly A101CMa–1992)Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Contractor, Construction Manager as Adviser Edition.
Budget Management During the design phase of a project, the CMa assists with estimating the cost of constructing a project based on a description from the design team and ownerthat conveys the preliminary design and what is proposed to be built. If certain aspects of the preliminary design are identified as probable factors causing a cost estimate to exceed the Owner’s budget goals, a group decision can be made to modify the design, saving time, effort, and design fees for re-designing and modifying completed construction documents. With this level of informed decision-making during the early design phases of a project, the Owner may also be able to procure or identify additional funding for the project rather than reduce the desired scope or quality. Advantages of this Delivery System
The CMa approach adds a fourth party to the basic project relationship who plays a significant coordinating role. This approach has great potential to support and take advantage of a highly collaborative project team. The procurement and construction phases of the project can be pursued using many project delivery methods including competitive bidding, negotiated, accelerated, and collaborative methods. Again, the CMa provides advice, assistance, and logistical support. In addition, the CMa can be instrumental in monitoring quality and progress. This method is extremely well suited to “Multiple Prime” contracts such as required under Pennsylvania’s Separations Act of 1913. The CMa can take on the coordinating role typically played by a general contractor in a more conventional contract arrangement. This construction coordination role is missing from the requirements of the PA Separations Act. Disadvantages of this Delivery System:
CMa is a complicated arrangement, best suited to large and complex projects. Owners with little or no construction industry experience tend to place excessive trust in this method and often develop unrealistic expectations regarding the various roles – including their own. Maintaining Positive Working Relationships An atmosphere of cooperation and mutual respect needs to be maintained throughout the course of the project for any project delivery process to function properly. Every party (Owner, CM, Architect, Engineers, Consultants, and Constructors) needs to be allowed opportunities to offer input and expertise. This input also needs to be considered, rather than challenged, by the other members of the team. Input from the CMa about any assumptions made, or deviations from the preliminary design description taken in the course of their cost estimating, must also be conveyed to the Design Team to ensure the design is developed in concert with the project budget. Through constant and open communications between all parties during all phases of the project, the CMa system maximizes awareness amongst the Owner, Design Team, Construction Team, and Construction Manager - Adviser of each other’s goals and expectations. This allows each party to perform their part of the project in the most effective manner. Typically, however, the constructor is added late in the process and does not participate in the essential collaboration.
Back to Procurements & Supplements |
||||
About Us | Best Practices Guides | Glossary | Hot Topics | Contact | Home © 2023 AIA MBA Joint Committee |